A bloke who runs a twelve person firm outside Oldham told me last year that he would love to take on a young lad, but he couldn’t justify it. “By the time I’ve trained him up,” he said, “I’ve lost half a year. I can’t carry that.”

I have heard some version of that sentence in nearly every SME I have ever worked in. It is always about the money. It is almost never actually about the money.

I thought about him again last week, because the sums have changed.

What is actually on the table

Since the start of August, apprenticeship training is fully funded for smaller businesses taking on anyone aged 16 to 24. That used to stop at 21 unless the young person had an education, health and care plan or was a care leaver. Now it covers the lot.

On top of that there is a stack of cash for the hire itself. The Youth Jobs Grant pays £3,000 for taking on an 18 to 24 year old who has been on Universal Credit and looking for work for six months or more. It lands in two chunks, £1,800 in month two and £1,200 in month five. From October there is a £2,000 hiring grant for smaller employers taking on a 16 to 24 year old apprentice, plus a £2,000 foundation apprenticeship incentive and a £1,000 payment for younger apprentices and care leavers.

And you pay no employer National Insurance on an under 21, or on an apprentice under 25 earning below £50,270.

Stack the right ones together and you are looking at up to eight thousand pounds of support for a hire you were already half thinking about.

There is more coming further out. A household bursary of up to £4,500 is being designed for families on Universal Credit, because the benefits system has been quietly punishing parents whose kids take an apprenticeship. One case in the announcement had a single parent with a disabled child losing around £340 a week against apprentice earnings of £258. That is not a young person choosing the sofa. That is a family doing the maths and getting the only answer available to them. Fixing it is overdue and genuinely good.

And from September 2028, 14 year olds will be able to take proper technical routes from Year 10, sat alongside English and maths rather than underneath them.

Behind all of it sits a number that should stop you dead. More than a million young people in this country are not in education, employment or training. Roughly one in eight.

Now the bit nobody is saying

I am glad the money is there. I want to be clear about that before I get critical, because I have spent years around this stuff and the funding genuinely helps.

But here is what I know from actually being inside these businesses.

The reason you have not hired a nineteen year old is not that they cost too much. It is that you have nobody to look after them.

You are already at capacity. Your best supervisor is your best supervisor because she is brilliant at the actual job, and you promoted her for that, and nobody has ever taught her how to develop a person. So a young lad turns up on the Monday, keen, a bit nervous, no workplace habits yet, and he gets parked next to someone who has not got time to explain anything twice.

Six weeks later he is quiet, he is slow, and somebody says “he’s just not got it”. He gets managed out or he drifts off. And the owner concludes, quite reasonably from where he is stood, that young people are hard work.

Then a grant scheme comes along and pays him eight grand to do the exact same thing again.

Money does not fix a capability gap

I wrote a while back about some research from the Chartered Management Institute. Only 6 per cent of managers think young recruits are ready for work. The headlines all went after Gen Z, predictably.

But the same research found that 82 per cent of managers are what it calls accidental managers. Promoted for being good at the job, never trained to lead anybody. And of the ones who did get some training, 89 per cent said it made them better at developing younger staff.

Read those two numbers next to each other and the story changes completely. We take our best doer, promote her, give her nothing, hand her a teenager, and then we are surprised.

A subsidy does not touch that. A subsidy makes it cheaper to repeat.

If you take the money and change nothing else, the most likely outcome is that you spend somebody’s grant discovering the same thing you discovered last time. The money is a reason to hire. It is not a plan for what happens on the Monday.

What to do before you take the money

This is the part that costs nothing, so there is no excuse for skipping it.

Name the person, not the job. Before you advertise anything, decide who in your business is actually responsible for this young person’s first ninety days. One name. Not “the team”. A team cannot notice that someone is struggling. A person can.

Give that person an hour a week and mean it. Put it in the diary as a recurring slot with the young person’s name on it. If your supervisor is too busy for one hour a week, she is too busy to take the hire, and you have just learned something important about your capacity before it costs you a person.

Write down what good looks like at thirty, sixty and ninety days. Three lines each. Nothing fancy. Most young people are not failing your standard, they are guessing at it. Guessing looks identical to not caring from the outside, and it is the single most common way a decent young hire gets written off.

Teach the supervisor before you teach the apprentice. This is the one everybody skips. If you are going to spend money anywhere, spend it here. The grant covers the young person’s training. Nothing covers the fact that the person receiving them has never been shown how to bring someone on.

Book the leaving conversation on day one. Sit down at ninety days and ask them straight what has been confusing, what nobody explained, and what they have not wanted to ask about. You will get more useful information in twenty minutes than in six months of assuming it is fine.

The bigger picture

I teach at UA92 and I see the other side of this. Young people who are sharp, willing, and genuinely worried that nobody is going to give them a first go. Then I sit with owners who want to give someone a first go and cannot see how to make it work.

That gap is not a money problem. It never really was. It is a leadership capability problem sat in the middle of a million and a half small businesses, and no chancellor can write a cheque for it.

So take the money. Honestly, take it. It is your money and the support is real and the timing is good.

Just do not mistake it for the plan.

Because the businesses that will get something lasting out of this are not the ones that move quickest to claim it. They are the ones that spend a fortnight beforehand working out who is going to sit with the lad on the Monday, and what they are going to say to him.

That is the whole difference. And it is free.

---

If you are thinking about taking someone young on and you would rather not repeat last time, that is a good half hour’s conversation. Grab a free consultation and we will work out who in your business is actually ready to develop somebody, and what they need first.